A major election integrity proposal championed by President Donald Trump cleared another hurdle Wednesday, but its toughest test may still lie ahead.House Republicans approved legislation that not only funds key national security agencies but also sets up what could become one of the biggest legislative battles of the year over proof-of-citizenship requirements for voting.
The House voted 217-209 to pass a fiscal year 2027 appropriations bill funding the State Department, national security programs, and other federal priorities.
One Democrat joined Republicans in supporting the measure, while one Republican voted against it.
To satisfy conservative lawmakers, House leaders attached the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act to the legislation before sending it to the Senate using a legislative procedure known as MIRVing.
The SAVE America Act would require individuals to provide proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote in federal elections.
It would require voters to present identification when casting a ballot.
President Trump has repeatedly described the legislation as one of his administration’s top priorities, arguing it is necessary to strengthen election integrity and ensure that only eligible citizens participate in federal elections.
The bill now heads to the Senate, where its future remains uncertain.
Several reports indicate that senators are likely to remove the SAVE America Act from the appropriations package before they consider final passage.
Even so, House Republicans say attaching the proposal keeps pressure on the Senate to act.
“The pressure’s gonna be on the Senate,” Rep. Marlin Stutzman, R-Ind., told Fox News Digital.
“Certain senators are gonna have to find a real come-to-Jesus moment to pass the strongest reconciliation package possible.”
The funding bill marks the third appropriations measure approved by the House this year.
Lawmakers previously passed legislation funding military construction and the Department of Veterans Affairs, including more than $2 billion for improvements to VA medical facilities and national cemeteries.
The House also approved an agriculture appropriations bill providing $1.16 billion for the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service while strengthening efforts to track foreign ownership of American farmland.
Meanwhile, Senate Republicans continue searching for a procedural path that could allow at least portions of the SAVE America Act to survive Senate rules governing budget reconciliation.
Under the Senate’s Byrd Rule, reconciliation bills can remove provisions that are considered unrelated to federal spending or revenue..
Republican lawmakers have acknowledged the SAVE America Act, as currently written, would likely face significant procedural hurdles.
One option under discussion would create a federal grant program allowing states to voluntarily adopt many of the election integrity measures contained in the legislation.
Supporters believe that the approach could better satisfy Senate procedural requirements.
“If this provision is written the right way — tied to states that already have voter ID on the books, not a new federal enforcement — I believe it can survive reconciliation’s rules,” Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., told Fox News Digital.
Marshall said, however, that he wants Congress to go even further.
“But I’m not satisfied with a Band-Aid. We need Democrats and every Republican to actually vote yes on voter ID, on proof of citizenship, and on real guardrails for mail-in ballots,” he said.
House Administration Committee members have now been tasked with developing the election-related provisions and have until Sept. 11 to complete their work.
Despite skepticism from some Republicans who have described the legislation as “dead on arrival” in the Senate, House Speaker Mike Johnson expressed confidence the effort will ultimately succeed.
“We’ll get it done,” Johnson said.
With the House having completed its work, attention now shifts to the Senate, where lawmakers will decide whether President Trump’s signature election integrity proposal survives intact, is significantly rewritten or is removed from the legislation altogether, Fox News reported.
The outcome could determine whether one of the administration’s top legislative priorities reaches the president’s desk before the 2026 midterm elections.